<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Molecule of the Week (06)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.justachemblog.net/molecule-of-the-week-06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.justachemblog.net/molecule-of-the-week-06/</link>
	<description>notes, thoughts, and a little (science) culture while teaching chemistry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:19:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pweibel</title>
		<link>http://www.justachemblog.net/molecule-of-the-week-06/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>pweibel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justachemblog.net/?p=242#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Very good question. The molecule binds through the minor groove of the DNA, where there is little specificity for interactions. This is because cytosine and thymine present the same hydrogen bonding partners. The &#039;unique&#039; hydrogen bonding partners are found on the major groove side. Additionally, the molecule really isn&#039;t large enough to have a large sequence specificity - which means that if it does preferentially bind to a sequence, it will be short enough that it&#039;s most likely repeated around the genome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good question. The molecule binds through the minor groove of the DNA, where there is little specificity for interactions. This is because cytosine and thymine present the same hydrogen bonding partners. The &#8216;unique&#8217; hydrogen bonding partners are found on the major groove side. Additionally, the molecule really isn&#8217;t large enough to have a large sequence specificity &#8211; which means that if it does preferentially bind to a sequence, it will be short enough that it&#8217;s most likely repeated around the genome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skassel</title>
		<link>http://www.justachemblog.net/molecule-of-the-week-06/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>skassel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justachemblog.net/?p=242#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m referring to specificity of &#039;binding&#039; to the DNA wrt the base pairs, i.e., is there selectivity to a specific base pair and does the amino acid side chain contribute to the specificity. And does it actually bind or does it intercalate into the DNA strand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m referring to specificity of &#8216;binding&#8217; to the DNA wrt the base pairs, i.e., is there selectivity to a specific base pair and does the amino acid side chain contribute to the specificity. And does it actually bind or does it intercalate into the DNA strand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pweibel</title>
		<link>http://www.justachemblog.net/molecule-of-the-week-06/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>pweibel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justachemblog.net/?p=242#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I am pretty sure there really is no &#039;selectivity&#039; in the normal sense for this molecule: you just want something that will bind DNA. I think the selectivity comes from the human control of the irradiation - after that it will (hopefully) deal irreparable damage to all of the DNA in the cell. Is that what you mean? It&#039;s kinda like a spray-and-pray tactic combined with super-precise activation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pretty sure there really is no &#8216;selectivity&#8217; in the normal sense for this molecule: you just want something that will bind DNA. I think the selectivity comes from the human control of the irradiation &#8211; after that it will (hopefully) deal irreparable damage to all of the DNA in the cell. Is that what you mean? It&#8217;s kinda like a spray-and-pray tactic combined with super-precise activation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skassel</title>
		<link>http://www.justachemblog.net/molecule-of-the-week-06/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>skassel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justachemblog.net/?p=242#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Pretty cool Paul! My question is of selectivity, or is that where the amino acid side chain comes into play?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty cool Paul! My question is of selectivity, or is that where the amino acid side chain comes into play?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.justachemblog.net @ 2012-02-06 01:23:24 -->
